Analysing a Conflict INCOMPLETE
1.
Gun silence is on a steady and dangerous rise in US, and is only becoming a bigger national issue with the opposing perspectives on gun control; Some people believe gun laws should become stricter to protect the public, while many others believe it is their constitutional right to be able to own guns.
2.
The issue is formed from many different perspectives that clash, which include power control and safety. Many argue that the Constitution (Second Amendment) allows them to own guns, although many people will say the Second Amendment doesn't apply anymore because it was written almost 200 years ago (1787).
3.
There are two major parties in this conflict: for and against guns (in some perspective, it is Democrat V. Republican). If a mediator were to come in and attempt to settle this, it will case even more chaos amongst the people because it is very difficult to find a solution that appeals to all sides.
4.
The powers amongst the parties is very unbalanced: the parties for gun control has much less power than the parties who want guns to be readily available, mainly because the NRA supports/supported by the government.
5.
There is a very violent relationship to between the parties. Gun violence and control has become a very controversial topic, and doesn't typically end without an argument.
Gun silence is on a steady and dangerous rise in US, and is only becoming a bigger national issue with the opposing perspectives on gun control; Some people believe gun laws should become stricter to protect the public, while many others believe it is their constitutional right to be able to own guns.
2.
The issue is formed from many different perspectives that clash, which include power control and safety. Many argue that the Constitution (Second Amendment) allows them to own guns, although many people will say the Second Amendment doesn't apply anymore because it was written almost 200 years ago (1787).
3.
There are two major parties in this conflict: for and against guns (in some perspective, it is Democrat V. Republican). If a mediator were to come in and attempt to settle this, it will case even more chaos amongst the people because it is very difficult to find a solution that appeals to all sides.
4.
The powers amongst the parties is very unbalanced: the parties for gun control has much less power than the parties who want guns to be readily available, mainly because the NRA supports/supported by the government.
5.
There is a very violent relationship to between the parties. Gun violence and control has become a very controversial topic, and doesn't typically end without an argument.
Comments
Post a Comment